In September 1950, Under
General Lucius D. Clay’s name, an invitation was sent to “college men and women
to join the Crusade for Freedom.” In part this invitation read:
·
STATEMENTS
from the president of your college and from the president of your student body
will help put the CRUSADE FOR FREEDOM into action, enhance its importance, thus
helping to assure its success. These statements can also be publicized in your
campus press, and in the local press and radio.
·
ARRANGE to
have Freedom Scrolls and Contribution Boxes in each dormitory or residence
including Sorority and Fraternity houses, and in all buildings on campus.
·
ENLIST
students to man tables for the signing of the Freedom Scrolls and to supervise
collection of contributions.
·
RALLIES or
meetings in stadium or auditorium to arouse general enthusiasm.
·
ARRANGE for
news stories in your college newspapers and other publications to cover the
CRUSADE. Most college newspaper editors have been sent releases, giving full
information, enclosing a one-column mat of the Freedom Bell, and offering
glossy photos on request. Urge them to use these releases in whole or in part
and add a running news account of your own CRUSADE activities: names of
leaders, where and how signatures may be signed, groups obtaining largest
percentage of signers, etc.
The Crusade for Freedom
was not universally accepted at the college level in the United States in 1950.
Below we will look briefly at Barnard College, founded in 1889, where President
Obama gave the commencement speech to graduating students last week.
In September 1950, Barnard
College, “The Liberal Arts College for Women in New York City”, affiliated with
Columbia University, where Dwight D. Eisenhower was president, publicly
questioned the true background of both Radio Free Europe and the Crusade for
Freedom. The editorial staff of the college newspaper Barnard Bulletin wrote on
September 28, 1950:
·
Precisely what
is this crusade and what are its objectives? The organization's publicity
material calls it "a mobilization of million of Americans in the battle
against Communist propaganda and aggression." These are vague, innocuous
terms, as are those of the "Declaration of Freedom." We are skeptical
of platitudes — and of their possible interpretations.
·
Who runs the National
Committee for a Free Europe, and who decides its policies? It is a private
organization, with prominent supporters, asserting itself "uninhibited by
government protocol and able to meet Communist propaganda on its own
terms." But what terms do its directors stress on delicate issues, where
private supporters may disagree with official policies?
·
What is the
tenor of "Radio Free Europe's" broadcasts? Its programs feature
expatriates from Bulgaria, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Poland and Rumania,
speaking to the people of their homelands. But what political elements do these
exiles represent?
In a letter to the editors
published in the October 12, 1950, edition, one student wrote,
Both the Student Council and
student-newspaper of Cornell University have rejected official sponsorship of
the campaign. The newspaper of Wayne University, the Collegian, pointed out
that the Freedom Scroll can quite easily be
turned into a nation-wide loyalty oath where those who refuse to sign, for
whatever personal reasons, could be considered not to be in support of the
freedom of which the Scroll so fluently speaks.
Frank Altschul, Treasurer
of the National Committee for Free Europe (NCFE) and Chairman of the Radio
Committee (responsible for Radio Free Europe) also was a Trustee of Barnard
College. In response to the skepticism expressed at the college, Atschul gave
an interview to the Barnard Bulletin:
In approach, Mr. Altschul explains, RFE programs
attempt to "mix the maximum amount of entertainment with propaganda."
A typical device is the dialogue, between pre-Communist "Old John"
and Communist-indoctrinated "New John," which points up the changes
in ways of life and thinking. Satire is frequent, and Mr. Altschul notes that
it can be sharper than in "Voice of America," since it is not
attributable to a government source.
The main policy thread of the 'broadcasts is
attacks on Communism, rather than advocacy of any program. "We're not
trying to proselytize the American system," Mr. Altschul asserts, and
broadcasts stress the particular internal problems of the Iron Curtain nations.
In line with this political approach, RFE avoids stands on partisan policies or
fractional questions that will arise if the Communist regime is ended.
Broadly stated, RFE's attempt is to direct
propaganda against Communist satellite regimes, stressing the problems of the
particular country. Within this theme, Mr. Altschul indicates... that anyone
entering a controversial field must expect to make mistakes and be criticized.
At the end of the Crusade
campaign at Barnard College, a total of only 50 out of approximately 1000 (5 %)
students had signed the Freedom Scroll and 85 faculty members out of 135 (63 %)
had signed it. Among the reasons given for the low number of student signatures
were:
·
Insufficient
publicity and information on the Crusade
·
The labor
Youth League had passed out leaflets in opposition
·
Disapproval of
the backers
·
Skepticism as
to constructiveness of the Crusade’s purposes
·
Opposition to
the employment of propaganda in today’s international situation

No comments:
Post a Comment